Integration: inside Individual, not a fourth family

Unverified draft. The structural facts below are checked against our own chart engine. The wording has not yet been reviewed by a Human Design professional.

Gates
10, 20, 34, 57
Theme
survival and empowerment of the self in the now
Status
part of the Individual circuit group, not a fourth circuit family
Centres
G, Throat, Sacral, Spleen
Possible_channels
10-20, 10-34, 10-57, 20-34, 20-57, 34-57

Integration is not a fourth circuit family, although it is often presented under its own heading. The official material names three circuit groups and places the Integration channels inside the Individual group, alongside the Knowing and Centering circuits. What makes Integration distinctive is that it is not really a circuit at all. It is a relationship between four gates, 10, 20, 34 and 57, held by four centres (G, Throat, Sacral and Spleen), which can link into six channels.

There is more to this entry

The rest is free to read with an account. Members can also vote on entries, leave corrections, and, if you are a practitioner, verify an entry under your own name.

This entry is part of the reference library Bella reads from when she answers questions about your chart. It was written by us, with the structural facts pinned to our own chart data rather than to a general model's recollection.

Provenance: researched and cross-checked 22 August 2026 against Jovian Archive and humdes.com Sources: https://jovianarchive.com/pages/human-design-dictionary; https://jovianarchive.com/pages/what-is-circuitry-in-human-design; https://www.humdes.com/en/kb/circuitry/ Noted at time of writing: Two points where sources are not identical. First, Jovian Archive's circuitry page names four channels as "the Integration Channel" (10-20, 20-34, 10-57, 34-57) while its dictionary describes four gates with the only multi-gate definition potential, which mechanically yields six channels; other material states plainly that the four gates create six possible channels. The entry says four gates and six possible channels, which is the mechanically correct reading, but if the library elsewhere quotes a figure of four channels, the two should be reconciled deliberately rather than left to differ. Second, Ra-attributed teaching material states that the Integration channels "do not belong to any circuits", which reads as a stronger separation than Jovian Archive's own placement of them inside the Individual group. The entry reports both positions rather than choosing between them. Not yet reviewed by a certified practitioner.